Camex Ltd, specialist in Textile & Leather Dyes is. It
is one of the pioneer in manufacturing Dyestuffs in India.Camex today has setup
a state of art manufacturing facilities and has a complete range of Textile
& Leather Dyestuffs, Auxiliaries, Dye-Intermediates, and Pigment Dispersions
in there Product Portfolio.
Camex has global presence in more than 45 countries world
wide.
Camex's main manufacturing facility is located at
Ankleshwar, a hub for Dyes & Chemical manufacturers in India. It is well
developed & easy accessible Industrial area located 250km north of Mumbai
on the main Mumbai-Ahmedabad route. The plant has the capacity of manufacturing
8000MT/PA of dyestuffs which includes full range of Reactive, Acid and Direct
dyes.
Year
|
2017-E
|
2016
|
2015
|
2014
|
Revenue
|
103
|
101.57
|
146.7
|
221.38
|
Other Income
|
1
|
0.26
|
0.15
|
0.03
|
Total Income
|
104
|
101.84
|
146.85
|
221.4
|
Expenditure
|
-99
|
-98.03
|
-140.96
|
-214.78
|
Interest
|
-1.6
|
-1.71
|
-3.05
|
-3.16
|
PBDT
|
3.4
|
2.09
|
2.84
|
3.47
|
Depreciation
|
-0.76
|
-0.71
|
-0.7
|
-0.62
|
PBT
|
2.64
|
1.38
|
2.15
|
2.85
|
Tax
|
-0.59
|
-0.46
|
-0.73
|
-0.94
|
Net Profit
|
2.05
|
0.92
|
1.42
|
1.92
|
Equity
|
10.21
|
10.21
|
10.21
|
10.21
|
EPS
|
2
|
0.9
|
1.39
|
2.57
|
The Indian dyestuffs and pigments industry has transformed from being
import dependent to export driven industry. Developed countries are now
focusing on sourcing dyestuffs and pigments from cost effective Asian Markets.
Exports have grown in double digit over the last few years. The Indian
Dyestuffs industry meets more than 95% of the domestic requirements. The size
of world Dyestuff industry is estimated at US$ 6 billion and is growing at
about 2.7%. China is the largest manufacturer of dyes followed by India.
The Global colorant industry is valued at US $27 Billion and has been
growing at 2.7% p.a. The decline of traditional producers in the developed
world, particularly in Europe, and the simultaneous ascent of new ones in Asia,
particularly India and China, is arguably one of the most significant changes
ever seen in the industry. The shift has been quite swift and followed the
migration of end-user industries notably textiles and leather – to low cost
economies of Asia.
With rising environment concern in China lot of big chemical industries
are going to close which shall be boon
to Indian chemical industry.
Target Price:
Camex has book value of Rs 22 and market cap of 29 crores , expected EPS of 2 for year 2017-18 so stock is available at forward PE of 14 based upon expected EPSwhich is slightly expensive but if we look at other bigger players in similar
sector they command much higher PE in comparison.
In lieu of above positive factors Camex has potential to improve
top line and bottom line in future.
Long term investor may buy this potential multibagger at
CMP of Rs 28-29 having very low risk of going down and with enormous potential
of creating new peaks in next 1-3 years.
Thanks sir! was able get around 29.90/ if that is ok :).. Thanks again sir!
ReplyDeleteHello mukesh sir,
ReplyDeleteCan you please share the tentative time frame for CHEMCRUX ENTERPRISE invesment?
Thank you.
Thank u Sir. I have invested on same. Most of share u have recommended is doing good.
ReplyDeletenew to this blog looks interesting mukesh sir whats your view on bhansali engineering and polymer at cmp ? thanks
ReplyDeleteRecommended in the past Hold it for long term
DeleteHi Mukesh, Can you please advice on the target expected from CAMEX and the time frame for the same.
ReplyDeleteDifficult to assign target but i see it creating new highs in the long term-1-2 years
DeleteThanks Mukesh sir for getting back.
DeleteFor my understanding I have a question
When I see the Revenue and Profit for FY15 and FY16 it has gone down, should that be an issue from an investment point of view.
This is being asked more of trying to understand the parameters that are being considered by you for investing in this stock.
Hi stocks are bought keeping in mind what company could do in future past performance is good reference but it is always history .low Margins is a concern but I am if opinion that in future margin improvement and tooling growth could be deciding factor I see lit of value in the business model with low market cap of 28 crores against turnover of 100+ crores
DeleteThanks Mukesh Ji for taking your time out in replying, appreciate your valuable feedback on my query.
Deletemukesh sir your view on the future consumer and max ventures her onwards
ReplyDeletesorry rocky i don't track these stocks
Deletecan i enter sicagen at 36 for LT
ReplyDeleteDear Madhu,
Deletesicagen is a good bet for long term
sir... Camex result showing loss? Please let us know your views sir?
ReplyDeleteLoss in 4th quarter is bit surprising for me as well which is due to higher tax but NP grew by more than 50% i was expecting EPS of 2 for FY2016-17 refer my report but it achieved EPS of 1.91 slightly lower then expectation due to higher tax provisioning but i remain bullish on stock
DeleteOK sir.. Thanks for clarification will hold and buy on dips :)
DeleteHi Sir, What is the EPS expected for FY18E in your opinion.
ReplyDeleteHi Im expecting EPS of around 3
DeleteCamex is struggling to get above 27. How long do you think it will take to come to 40
ReplyDeleteAll my recommendation are for long term nit possible to give short term targets....
DeleteJune quater results was poor....
ReplyDeleteWhats your view sir.....???
please hold
Delete30% loss yoy....bad results for camex...whats the reason? Stock is down to 25
ReplyDeletePankaj Ji,
ReplyDeleteI went through the results on face of it looking not good but not disappointing.I would like to see one more quarter because there could be GST effect which effected the top line and inventory.
Thanks. I have about 5000 shares of camex at avg 28 levels. It keeps fluctuating from 25 to 29. Will hold longer. I liked your other recommendations if Sakthi and Ishan....bought those two as well
ReplyDeleteMukeshji, promoter holding has increased which is positive. Any further updates on camex?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete